Neoliberal Educational Policies and Their Implications for Islamic Education: A Literature Review

  • Andika Apriansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia
  • Indah Wigati Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia
  • Abdurrahmansyah Abdurrahmansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia
  • Fajri Ismail Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia
Keywords: Education Policy, Islamic Education, Marketization, Neoliberalism, Religious Education

Abstract

Neoliberal rationalities have increasingly influenced educational governance through competition, marketization, accountability, institutional differentiation, and responsiveness to economic demands, raising important questions about their implications for Islamic education. This study aimed to examine how neoliberal educational policies are manifested in Islamic educational contexts and how their consequences are negotiated by value-based institutions. The study employed qualitative library research using a structured literature review. The population comprised peer-reviewed scholarly publications published between 2021 and 2025, while the analytical sample consisted of eligible studies selected through purposive criterion-based screening from Google Scholar and Scopus. A structured data-extraction matrix was used to organize the literature, and the data were analyzed through thematic, comparative, and interpretive synthesis. The findings identified four interconnected dimensions: institutional governance and financing, access and social equity, curriculum and educational purpose, and religious identity and value formation. Neoliberal mechanisms promoted professional management, competition, differentiation, and global competencies but were also associated with socioeconomic stratification and religious commodification. Islamic educational institutions selectively incorporated these mechanisms while maintaining moral formation, religious identity, philanthropy, and social responsibility. The study concludes that neoliberalization in Islamic education constitutes a negotiated and context-dependent institutional process.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Brown, C. P., Ku, D. H., Barry, D. P., & Puckett, K. (2022). Examining preservice teachers’ conceptions of teaching to consider the impact of policymakers’ neoliberal reforms on their sensemaking of their new profession. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(5), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221105803
Cohen, E. (2024). Marketizing education: A microanalytic account. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 45(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2024.2335911
Emzir. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Analisis data (6th ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Fudiyartanto, F. A. (2024). English language teaching in a globalised world: A sociological investigation of Indonesian higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102395
Hadi, M., & Kesuma, T. A. R. P. (2025). Managing quality for Muslim middle-class expectations: A TQM-informed study of a leading Islamic school in Indonesia. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 13(1), 269–300. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v13i1.33383
Hidayah, S. N. (2021). Pesantren for middle-class Muslims in Indonesia: Between religious commodification and pious neoliberalism. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 9(1), 209–244. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v9i1.7641
Jatmiko, M. I., Wicaksono, H. H., Mekarsari, Y., & Syukron, M. (2025). Maintaining Al-Maun’s spirit amid the neoliberalization of education: A Bourdieusian analysis of the Muhammadiyah modern Islamic school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 24(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.24.1.2025.29-52
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16, 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Mintz, B. (2021). Neoliberalism and the crisis in higher education: The cost of ideology. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 80(1), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12370
Nurani, S., Maulana, L., & Purwati, E. (2022). Living Qur’an as new market trends of Islamic education in Indonesia. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21009/hayula.006.01.01
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pratama, R. Y., & Sugiarto, C. (2023). Parents’ religious considerations when choosing a school: Marketization of faith-based primary schools in Indonesia. Management Analysis Journal, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v12i1.66423
Ren, S. (2023). Neoliberalization of higher education in China: A critical discourse analytical approach. Language & Communication, 90, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.02.003
Sudaryono. (2021). Metodologi penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan mix method (2nd ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suyatno, S., Wantini, W., Sukiman, S., & Rachmawati, Y. (2022). Progressive Islamic education: Bridging the gap of Islam, Indonesianness, and modernity. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.4782
Wang, L., & Hamid, M. O. (2024). The transformation of neoliberalism: A critical analysis of shadow education governance policy in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102422
Published
2026-09-28
How to Cite
Andika Apriansyah, Indah Wigati, Abdurrahmansyah, A., & Fajri Ismail. (2026). Neoliberal Educational Policies and Their Implications for Islamic Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science , 5(04), 2030-2052. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i04.6692