Utilization of the Ruang Murid Digital Platform in Elementary School Learning: A Critical Study in Pedagogical Review

Lisda Citra Dewi; Yusuf Tri Herlambang; Delis Rahayu Suciani

doi:10.63922/ijevss.v5i04.6584

Lisda Citra Dewi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Yusuf Tri Herlambang Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Delis Rahayu Suciani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i04.6584

Keywords: Student Space Platform; Pedagogy; Digital Learning

Abstract

The rapid development of information and communication technology has driven digitalization in education, including at the elementary school level, which demands more adaptive and interactive learning. The Indonesian government, through the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education, has introduced the Ruang Murid platform within the Rumah Pendidikan ecosystem to support digital-based learning transformation. The purpose of this study is to critically examine the use of the Ruang Murid digital platform in elementary school learning from a pedagogical perspective through a systematic literature review. This study uses the methodSystematic Literature Review (SLR) with a literature study approach to identify, review, and synthesize various research results relevant to the use of digital learning platforms, especially the Ruang Murid platform and similar platforms in the context of elementary education. Ruang Murid has significant potential in supporting learning in elementary schools. The results of the review indicate that Ruang Murid provides a variety of diverse, flexible, and easily accessible digital learning resources so that it can support student learning engagement, increase learning motivation, and expand learning opportunities outside the classroom. From a pedagogical perspective, the characteristics of Ruang Murid show alignment with the principles of active learning, student-centered learning, and constructivism theory.

References

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2011). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. 17–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Blundell, C., Lee, K., & Nykvist, S. (2016). Digital Learning in Schools: Conceptualizing the Challenges and Influences on Teacher Practice. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., 15, 535–560. https://doi.org/10.28945/3578
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
Collier, D., De Marco, A., Ferreira, I., Meng, B., Datir, R., Walls, A., Kemp, S., Bassi, J., Pinto, D., Silacci-Fregni, C., Bianchi, S., Tortorici, M., Bowen, J., Culap, K., Jaconi, S., Cameroni, E., Snell, G., Pizzuto, M., Pellanda, A., … Gupta, R. (2022). Author Correction: Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 to mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies. Nature, 608. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05103-3
Davis, A., Nathanson, J., Attwood, K., Sinha, A., & Seiffert-Sinha, K. (2024). A retrospective analysis of patient-reported physical and psychological stressors as trigger factors in autoimmune bullous disease. Archives of Dermatological Research, 316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-03240-5
Denzin, N. (2012). Triangulation 2.0 *. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Hannafin, M., & Land, S. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002997414652
Howland, J., Marra, R., & Jonassen, D. (2007). Meaningful Learning with Technology. https://consensus.app/papers/meaningful-learning-with-technology-howland-marra/3490a9aafa6c586d9f8e0b78834aeef1/
Jaya, F., & Nurqamarani, A. (2023). Understanding Student Engagement in Hybrid Learning : An Analysis Impact Digital Literacy and Academic Self-Efficacy. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.7947
Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. (2002). Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. https://consensus.app/papers/learning-to-solve-problems-with-technology-a-jonassen-howland/b077845fbd4a5f48a40c10eac2afd684/
Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Hariadi, M., Warsono, W., & Wahyudi, A. (2021). The impact of collaborative model assisted by Google Classroom to improve students’ creative thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20987
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5
Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.185227
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108, 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Muhajir, S., Utari, S., & Suwarma, I. (2019). How to develop test for measure critical and creative thinking skills of the 21st century skills in POPBL? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032051
Samsuden, N., Kohar, U., Khatib, S., & Abbas, A. (2024). Digital Capabilities and Business Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411108
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rmyg8
Selwyn, N. (2024). On the Limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Pedagogikk Og Kritikk. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062
Sloane-Seale, A. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 35. https://doi.org/10.21225/d54s3d
Sudarto, Z., & Sasongko, T. B. (2020). Analysis of Implementations Inclusive Education in Surabaya City. 4, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.26740/inklusi.v4n1.p37-42
Zahara, R., Sulastri, & Syukri, M. (2020). Promoting inquiry-based learning for science, technology, engineering, math (STEM) to enhance students’ creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012120