Exploring The Implementation of Total Physical Response (TPR) in Facilitating Vocabulary Learning and Speaking Participation At a Vocational High School
Abstract
This study investigates the implementation of Total Physical Response (TPR) in facilitating vocabulary acquisition and speaking participations among vocational high school students. The research was motivated by students’ limited vocabulary mastery, low confidence in speaking English, and minimal participation in classroom communication activities. Considering the practical and kinesthetic characteristics of vocational education, TPR was selected as an interactive learning method that integrates language instruction with physical movement to create a more engaging learning environment.The study aimed to examine how TPR was implemented in English learning and to explore its role in supporting students’ vocabulary learning and speaking participation. This research employed a qualitative descriptive approach conducted at SMK PGRI 1 Sidoarjo. The participants consisted of one English teacher and ten tenth-grade students selected purposively. Data were collected through classroom observations conducted over four meetings and semi-structured interviews with the teacher and students. The data were analyzed through data reduction, categorization, interpretation, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed that the implementation of TPR encouraged active student participation, improved vocabulary comprehension through action-based instruction, and increased students’ confidence in speaking activities. The integration of gestures, commands, and contextual practice helped students understand and retain vocabulary more effectively while reducing anxiety in oral communication. In conclusion, TPR provides a practical and contextual approach to English language learning in vocational high schools and can serve as an effective alternative method for facilitating vocabulary development and speaking participation.
References
Asher, J. J. (1977). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guidebook. Sky Oaks Productions.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z. R. (2022). The effect of speaking tasks and classroom interaction on learners’ oral proficiency: A meta-analysis. System, 108, 102822.
Ghani, I. (2025). Promoting Total Physical Response for teaching English vocabulary: Teachers' perspectives in secondary schools. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics (JETLAL), 4(1), 20–32.
Gharibi, F., & Mahdavi, Z. (2022). The effect of Total Physical Response on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. TESL-EJ, 26(2), 1–16
Han, Y. (2024). Developing students’ speaking participation in EFL classrooms: A classroom based study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 45–58.
https://repository.uinsuska.ac.id/74532/1/FILE%20LENGKAP%20KECUALI%20HASIL%20PENNELTI IAN%20(BAB%20IV).pdf
Isnawati, I., & Wahyuni, D. S. (2023). Improving speaking participations of vocational school students using TPR method: A classroom action research. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(1), 15–25.
Lestari, A. R., & Putra, Y. (2021). The effect of TPR on reducing students' anxiety in speaking. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 7(2), 114–122.
Lin, C., Huang, H., & Wang, Y. (2022). Total Physical Response and EFL learners’ vocabulary development: A mixed-methods study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(18), 1–17.
Liu, P.-L., Chen, C.-J., & Chen, H.-C. (2024). Teaching young EFL learners new vocabulary: A comparison of the efficiency of traditional and personalized TPR strategies. SAGE Open, 14(4).
Mei, Y., & Yan, Z. (2023). Multisensory vocabulary learning through TPR: Effects on retention and engagement. ELT Journal, 77(2), 214–223.
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Pramesti, P., & Susanto, H. (2023). Enhancing vocational students' engagement through TPR-based English instruction. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 85–99.
Putri, S. A., & Riyanti, D. (2022). Factors influencing students’ speaking anxiety in English class. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 9(1), 67–75.
Rahimi, M., & Hashemi, M. (2021). The use of Total Physical Response in enhancing students’ language skills: A classroom-based perspective. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 33–47.
Rao, P. S. (2019). Cosmos, Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI) & Cosmos. Oray’s Publications Impact Factor: 4.845(SJIF). In www.rjoe.org.in An International Peer-Reviewed English Journal (Vol. 4, Issue 1).
Sanders, L. M. (2020). Integrating physical activity into technical instruction: Effects on students’ concentration and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 113(4), 311–325.
Sukowati, R., & Nurweni, A. (2023). The effectiveness of TPR method to improve students’ vocabulary at vocational school. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 50–64.
Torky, A. E. F. (2006). The effectiveness of a task-based instruction program in developing the English language speaking participations of secondary stage students. Ain Shams University.
Yao, L., Sulaiman, R. B., & Anggraeni, D. (2025). Integrating ESP with vocational training in Asian contexts. Asian ESP Journal, 17(1), 45–60.




.png)











Contact Person +6282139474255
Email : ijeterjournal@gmail.com