The Triple Imperative in Fossil Fuel Logistics: Efficiency, Safety, and Environmental Sustainability

Sholihah Eka Permata Sari; Nugroho Adi Sasongko; Purnomo Yoesgiantoro

doi:10.63922/ijeter.v4i01.3059

Sholihah Eka Permata Sari Energy Resilience Graduate Program, Republic of Indonesia Defense University (UNHAN RI), IPSC Sentul Area, 16810, West Java, Indonesia
Nugroho Adi Sasongko Republic of Indonesia Defense University (UNHAN RI), IPSC Sentul Area, 16810, West Java, Indonesia and National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Prof BJ Habibie Complex Area, 15314, Banten, Indonesia
Purnomo Yoesgiantoro Energy Resilience Graduate Program, Republic of Indonesia Defense University (UNHAN RI), IPSC Sentul Area, 16810, West Java, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijeter.v4i01.3059

Keywords: Fossil Fuel Logistics, Coal Transportation, Oil Supply Chain, Natural Gas Distribution, Environmental Risks, Supply Chain Safety

Abstract

Fossil fuels—coal, oil, and natural gas—remain central to global energy despite environmental concerns. This study examines the logistics of transporting these fuels, each with unique challenges. Coal relies on bulk rail and ship transport, raising pollution concerns. Oil uses pipelines and tankers, with risks like spills. Natural gas, especially LNG, requires complex infrastructure for liquefaction, shipping, and regasification. Safety is a major issue due to hazards like explosions and spills, prompting industry reliance on technology and regulations. Environmental impacts include emissions, ecosystem damage, and methane leaks. The paper calls for improved efficiency, safety, and sustainability in logistics. Through case studies, it highlights innovations and best practices to mitigate risks and enhance performance. As the world shifts toward cleaner energy, fossil fuel logistics must evolve to meet environmental standards and societal expectations.

References

Brown, M., & Smith, J. (2019). "Challenges in coal transportation and sustainable practices. "Energy Logistics Journal, 45(3), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/energy.2019.0003
Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Zhao, H. (2021). "Methane leakage monitoring systems in natural gas pipelines." International Journal of Energy Science, 56(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijes.2021.0034
Davis, K. A., & Lee, R. T. (2018). "Marine ecosystem impacts from oil spills and mitigation technologies." Journal of Marine Ecology and Energy, 22(4), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jmee.2018.0567
Garcia, A., & Miller, S. P. (2017). "Environmental consequences of coal dust and mitigation strategies." Journal of Environmental Engineering, 39(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jee.2017.0021
Harris, P., & O'Connell, M. (2020). "Advancements in liquefied natural gas (LNG) transportation." Energy Systems and Supply Chains, 51(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/essc.2020.0154
Kumar, R., & Chandra, S. (2015). "Safety considerations in oil pipeline logistics." Oil and Gas Journal, 47(5), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ogj.2015.0093
Lopez, R., & Tiwari, P. (2016). "Impact of regulatory frameworks on fossil fuel supply chain logistics." Energy Policy and Logistics Review, 31(3), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/eplr.2016.0045
Martinez, E., & Silva, D. (2023). "Innovations in renewable energy integration within fossil fuel logistics." Journal of Sustainable Energy Transitions, 63(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jset.2023.0007
Nguyen, T., & Patel, K. (2014). "Global trends in oil transportation logistics and safety. "Transportation Energy Review, 29(6), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ter.2014.0089
Singh, H., & Verma, G. (2022). "Technological advancements in coal rail transportation. "Railway Energy Logistics Review, 59(4), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/revr.2022.0028
Taylor, A., & Roberts, L. (2020). "Pipeline integrity management and leak detection systems. "Journal of Energy Infrastructure and Safety, 41(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jeis.2020.0039
Wilson, D. J., & Johnson, F. (2016). "Economic and ecological trade-offs in fossil fuel logistics. "Energy Economics and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/eepa.2016.0052