Analysis Of Factors Affecting Construction Waste Reduction Using The Structural Equation Modeling Method

  • Francisco da Conceição Neves de Sousa Master of Civil Engineering, Universitas Janabadra, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Sahadi Master of Civil Engineering, Universitas Janabadra, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ilham Poernomo Master of Civil Engineering, Universitas Janabadra, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Nanta Sigit Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Wisnuwardhana, Malang, Indonesia
Keywords: Construction Waste Reduction, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

Abstract

Construction waste consists of materials that are not desired directly or indirectly by the construction industry. This includes inert and non-biodegradable building materials such as sand, blocks, concrete, plaster, wood, iron, broken tiles, bricks, masonry, insulation, nails, electrical cables and reinforcement, as well as all residual materials (waste) originating from from the Construction Project Site.Data collection methods in this research were carried out by sending questionnaires via personal chat or via e-mail in the form of Google form to members of contractors, planning consultants, as well as construction supervision/management consultants and other parties operating in the territory of Indonesia, then the data The questionnaire was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the help of SPSS and AMOS programs.Factors that influence the reduction of construction waste include Contractual (X1) with an influence value of 0.154. Material Transportation (X2) with an influence value of 0.140. Material Storage (X4) with an influence value of 0.203. Use of Construction Materials (X6) with an influence value of 0.352. Professional Ethics (X7) with an influence value of 0.177. Managerial Action (X8) with an influence value of 0.329. Government Subsidies (X10) with an influence value of 0.337 and Government Regulatory Policy (X11) with an influence value of 0.294. Furthermore, factors that do not have a significant influence are Place Management and Planning (X3), Location Operations (X5) and Sustainability (X9). The most dominant factors influencing the reduction of construction waste include Use of Construction Materials (X6) with an influence value of 0.352 and government subsidies (X10) with an influence value of 0.337.

References

Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling : Why and How of it ? Anita S Acharya , Anupam Prakash , Pikee Saxena ,. (January). https://doi.org/10.7713/ijms.2013.0032
Ajayi, S. O., & Oyedele, L. O. (2018). Waste-efficient materials procurement for construction projects : A structural equation modelling of critical success factors. Waste Management, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.025
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice : A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. 103(3), 411–423.
B, S. S., Manoj, H., & Madhav, K. (2016). Impact of the Construction Waste on the Cost of the Project. 6890(5), 126–128.
Bayuaji, T. A., Studi, P., Teknik, S., Tarumanagara, U., Studi, P., Teknik, S., & Tarumanagara, U. (2021). Analisis Faktor Pengaruh Dominan Peracangan Penerapan Model Rencana Insentif Pada Material Sisa Jenis Material yang Digunakan Dalam Konstruksi Jenis-Jenis Insentif. 4(3), 711–720.
Farzad, J., Milad, Z., & Afshin, K. (2019). Life cycle environmental impact assessment to manage and optimize construction waste using Building Information Modeling ( BIM ). International Journal of Construction Management, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1583850
Ferdinand, A. 2002. Metode Penelitian Manajemen : Pedoman untuk Scripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi ilmu Manajemen. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ferdinand, A. 2002. Structural equation modeling dalam Penelitian Manajemen : Aplikasi Model-Model Rumit Dalam Penelitian Untuk Tesis Magister, Dan Disertasi Doktor. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ferdinand, A. 2014. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. (Edisi 5). Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Fernando, Y., Jose, C., Jabbour, C., & Wah, W. (2019). Resources , Conservation & Recycling Pursuing green growth in technology fi rms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance : Does service capability matter ? Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 141(July 2018), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031
Golabchi, A., Guo, X., Liu, M., Han, S., & Lee, S. (2018). Automation in Construction An integrated ergonomics framework for evaluation and design of construction operations. Automation in Construction, 95(August), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.003
Golob, T. F. (2003). Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. 37, 1–25.
Graphical, A., View, T., & Graphical, A. (n.d.). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos.
Gulghane, A. A., & Khandve, P. P. V. (2015). Management for Construction Materials and Control of Construction Waste in Construction Industry : A Review. 5(4), 59–64.
Guo, F., Wang, J., & Song, Y. (2022). How to promote sustainable development of construction and demolation waste recycling system: Production subsidies or comsumptionsubsidies?
Hua, C., Liu, C., Chen, J., Yang, C., & Chen, L. (2022). Promoting construction and demolition waste recycling by using incentive policies in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 53844–53859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19536-w
Indonesia, R. (2017). Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2017.
Indonsia, R. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah No. 81 Tahun 2012.
Indonsia, R. (2014). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 101 Tahun 2014.
Indonsia, R. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR) Nomor 28/PRT/M/2016.
Ismam, J. N., & Ismail, Z. (2014). Sustainable Construction Waste Management Strategic Implementation Model. 10, 48–59.
Kabirifar, K., Mojtahedi, M., Wang, C. C., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2020). Jo ur na l P of. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100019
Li, J., Zuo, J., Cai, H., & Zillante, G. (2017). Construction waste reduction behavior of contractor employees : An extended theory of planned behavior model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.138
Liu, J., Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). An environmental assessment model of construction and demolition waste based on system dynamics : a case study in Guangzhou.
Liu, J., Yi, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Exploring factors in fluencing construction waste reduction : A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123185
Liu, J., Yi, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). Factors driving waste sorting in construction projects in China
Luangcharoenrat, C., Intrachooto, S., & Peansupap, V. (2019). Factors Influencing Construction Waste Generation in Building Construction : Thailand ’ s Perspective.
Makwana, A. H., Mata, R. M., & Pitroda, J. R. (2016). Source Identification And Minimization Of Waste In Building Construction Using Rii And Imp . I . Method. 1–11.
Mália, M., Brito, J. De, & Pinheiro, M. D. (2015). Construction and demolition waste indicators. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12471707
Maria, E., & Oliveira, G. De. (2022). Efisiensi Pengadaan Material Untuk Meminimalisasi Limbah. (March). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v4i3.1798
Misron, N. F., Khoiry, M. A., & Hamzah, N. (2018). A Framework of Efficient Material Storage Management on Congested Construction Site. 03005, 1–14.
Mohammed, M., Shafiq, N., Al-mekhlafi, A. A., Rashed, E. F., Khalil, M. H., Zawawi, N. A., … Sadis, A. M. (2022). The Mediating Role of Policy-Related Factors in the Relationship between Practice of Waste Generation and Sustainable Construction Waste Minimisation : PLS-SEM.
Mohammed, M., Shafiq, N., Elmansoury, A., Abdallah, N. A., & Muhammad, A. (2021). A confirmatory Framework PLS-SEM for Construction Waste reduction as part of achieving Sustainable Development Goals of a building. (July). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202107.0409.v1
Mohammed, M., Shafiq, N., Elmansoury, A., Al-mekhlafi, A. A., Rached, E. F., Zawawi, N. A., … Ibrahim, M. B. (2021). Modeling of 3R ( Reduce , Reuse and Recycle ) for Sustainable Construction Waste Reduction : A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ). 1–22.
Nagapan, S., Rahman, I. A., & Asmi, A. (2012). Factors Contributing to Physical and Non-Physical Waste Generation in Construction Industry. 1(1).
Naoum, S. G., Herrero, C., Egbu, C., Fong, D., Naoum, S. G., Herrero, C., … Fong, D. (2018). Integrated model for the stressors , stress , stress-coping behaviour of construction project managers in the UK. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-07-2017-0071
Patel, M., & Patel, N. (2019). Exploring Research Methodology : Review Article. 6(March).
Prihantara, A., Hartono, A. A., Wardani, P. M., Teknik, J., Politeknik, I., Cilacap, N., & Tengah, J. (2018). Studi kasus pengembangan sistem informasi manajemen proyek konstruksi. 04.
Primastiwi, A. (2021). Pengaruh Sosialisasi Perpajakan Dan Sanksi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Umkm E-. 21–29.
Putu, I. G., Suartika, A., Dharmayanti, G. A. P. C., Diah, A. A., & Dewi, P. (2018). Penanganan Waste Material Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung Bertingkat Waste Material Handling In Building Construction Projects. 6(2), 176–185.
Saad, A., Bal, M., & Khatib, J. (2022). The Need for a Proper Waste Management Plan for the Construction Industry : A Case Study in Lebanon.
Said, H., Asce, S. M., El-rayes, K., & Asce, M. (2011). Optimizing Material Procurement and Storage on Construction Sites. 137(6), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000307.
Santoso, 2021. Analisis structural Equation Modeling, Alex Media Komputindo, Kompas Gramedia, Jakarta, ISBN 9786230027031.
Sarwono, J. (2010). No Title. 1–18.
Sihombing, M. M. (2008). Pengelolaan limbah konstruksi di medan.
Simanjuntak, J. O. (2021). Analisa Kontrak Proyek Konstruksi Di Indonesia. 2(2), 205–214.
Simion, I., & Nicolau, A. (2023). Theoretical Considerations Regarding The Choice Of The Demolition Technology Of Minimum Impact Buildings On The. 13–16.
SS Kolaventi, T. T. & M. V. N. S. K. (2017). A Modeling Approach to Construction Waste Management. 11–20.
Sugiyono, 2022. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. (Edisi 2). Bandung : Badan Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sweis, G., Thneibat, M., Hiyassat, M., & Abu-khader, W. (2021). Understanding the Causes of Material Wastage in the Construction Industry. (April).
Thoengsal, James, Rusdi Usman Latief, S. H. dan I. R. R. (2020). Analisis pengaruh potensial model manajemen perencanaan, pengadaan dan pelaksanaan terhadap inefisiensi biaya akibat sisa material konstruksi bangunan gedung berbasis sem-pls (s.... (June 2022).
Wang, J., Li, Z., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2015). Identifying best design strategies for construction waste minimization. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.076
Wibowo, M Agung, & Koestalam, P. (2015). Identification and analyze of influence level on waste construction management of performance. Procedia Engineering, 125, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.008

Wibowo, Mochamad Agung. (2017). Model of Construction Waste Management Using AMOS-SEM for Indonesian Infrastructure Projects. 05005. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713805005
Yamin, Sofyan 2014. Rahasia Olah data Lisrel. Jakarta : Mitra Wacana Media.
Yam, J. H., & Taufik, R. (2021). Hipotesis Penelitian Kuantitatif. 3(2), 96–102.
Yuan, H. (2017). Barriers and Countermeasures for Managing Construction and Demolition Waste: a Case of Shenzhen in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.137
Yuan, H., Lu, W., & Jianli, J. (2013). The evolution of construction waste sorting on-site. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.012
Published
2026-01-08
How to Cite
Francisco da Conceição Neves de Sousa, Sahadi, Ilham Poernomo, & Nanta Sigit. (2026). Analysis Of Factors Affecting Construction Waste Reduction Using The Structural Equation Modeling Method. International Journal of Technology and Education Research, 4(01), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijeter.v4i01.2795