The Influence Of Work Discipline And Motivation On The Performance Of Members Of The Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) Of Medan City

Jumartatik; Amir Makhmud Zain Nasution; Riny Viri Insy Sinaga

doi:10.63922/ijebir.v5i06.6802

Jumartatik Alwashliyah University of Medan
Amir Makhmud Zain Nasution Alwashliyah University of Medan
Riny Viri Insy Sinaga Alwashliyah University of Medan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i06.6802

Keywords: Work Discipline, Motivation, Member Performance, Satpol PP (Civil Service Police Unit), Medan City

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the influence of work discipline and motivation on the performance of members of the Civil Service Police Unit (Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja, hereafter Satpol PP) of Medan City. Work discipline and motivation are important factors in improving the quality of performance of government officials, particularly Satpol PP members, whose duties include enforcing regional regulations, maintaining public order, and protecting the community.The results show that, based on the partial test of the influence of Work Discipline on Employee Performance, the t-value (4.605) is greater than the t-table value (2.011), with a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05. The value of 4.605 being greater than 2.011 shows that the t-value exceeds the t-table value. From these results it can be concluded that Ha is accepted (H0 is rejected). This indicates that Work Discipline has a significant influence on Employee Performance.Based on the partial test of the influence of Motivation on Employee Performance, the t-value (4.526) is greater than the t-table value (2.011), with a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05. The value of 4.526 being greater than 2.011 shows that the t-value exceeds the t-table value. From these results it can be concluded that Ha is accepted (H0 is rejected). This indicates that Motivation has a significant influence on Employee Performance.Based on the calculation results, the F-value is 25.919 with a significance level of 0.000, while the F-table value is 3.200 at a significance level of 0.05. Thus the F-value is greater than the F-table value, namely 25.919 > 3.200. The value of 25.919 being greater than 3.200 shows that the F-value exceeds the F-table value, meaning that H0 is rejected, so it can be concluded that Work Discipline and Motivation together have a significant influence on Employee Performance.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bangun, W. (2022). Manajemen Kinerja. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Bungin, B. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Danim, S. (2004). Motivasi Kepemimpinan dan Efektivitas Kelompok. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Edison, E., Anwar, Y., & Komariyah, I. (2021). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Strategi dan Perubahan dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kinerja Pegawai dan Organisasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ferdinand, A. (2006). Metode Penelitian Manajemen: Pedoman Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi Ilmu Manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I. (2020). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Handoko, T. H. (2022). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2022). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2009). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mas'ud, F. (2004). Survei Diagnosis Organisasional: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Nasution, A. M. Z. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Bukti Fisik dan Daya Tanggap Terhadap Kepuasan Wajib Pajak di Badan Pengelolaan Pajak dan Retribusi Daerah UPT Samsat Lubuk Pakam. Jurnal Implementasi Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 7(2), 1877–1893.
Priyono. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Surabaya: Zifatama Jawara.
Robbins, S. P. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi (Edisi ke-10). Jakarta: PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Saputra, A., & Handayani, S. (2023). Analisis Kinerja Pegawai di Era Digital: Pengaruh Literasi Teknologi dan Lingkungan Kerja Nonfisik. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kepegawaian, 5(2).
Siagian, S. P. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Simamora, H. (2005). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN.
Sinaga, R. V. I., Wati, R., & Zulaili. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Pegawai Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat pada Kantor Pos Cabang Balige. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 4(1), 167–180.
Singodimedjo, M. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Surabaya: SMMAS.
Siswanto, H. (2005). Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia: Pendekatan Administratif dan Operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Siyoto, S., & Sodik, M. A. (2020). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.
Soedjono. (2002). Pengaruh Struktur Organisasi, Budaya Organisasi, dan Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Ed. 3). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sujianto, A. E. (2021). Aplikasi Statistik dengan SPSS untuk Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Syahyuti. (2010). Definisi, Variabel, dan Indikator Penelitian. Jakarta: Bina Rena Pariwara.
Wardana, A. S. (2020). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (Studi pada Bank Rakyat Indonesia Cabang Sidrap) [Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar]. https://doi.org/10.55208/aj.v2i1.27.