Fraud as a Social Construction: Qualitative Findings on the Role of Opportunity and Gender Dynamics in Accounting Practices
Abstract
This study explores fraud as a socially constructed phenomenon shaped by individual experiences, organizational contexts, and gendered dynamics within accounting practices. Using a qualitative interpretive approach, data were gathered through in-depth interviews with auditors, practitioners, and academics to understand how meanings of fraud are formed, negotiated, and enacted. The findings reveal that opportunity remains the most dominant driver of fraudulent behavior, transcending gender boundaries. While participants initially associated fraud cases with male perpetrators due to media representation and structural exposure, the study shows that both men and women share equal potential to commit fraud when opportunities emerge. Gender differences appear not in the propensity to engage in fraud, but in access to roles, visibility, and situational pressures that shape exposure to such opportunities. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of fraud beyond traditional rational-choice models by emphasizing its socio-cultural embeddedness. Implications highlight the need for organizations to address structural factors that create opportunities for fraud and to reconsider gendered assumptions embedded within fraud risk assessments.
References
Basri, Y. M., Ardhya, S., & Rahmola, P. (2022). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia Gender , religiosity , and fraud : The role of unethical behavior as mediation. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 26(2).
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches - Fifth Edition. In Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2204s7w.11
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. In Harvard University Press.
Goldberg, S. R., Danko, D., & Kessler, L. ar. L. (2016). Ownership Structure, Fraud, and Corporate Governance. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 27(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf
Hilliard, T., & Neidermeyer, P. (2018). The Gendering of Fraud. Journal of Financial Crime.
Luo, J. hui, Peng, C., & Zhang, X. (2020). The impact of CFO gender on corporate fraud: Evidence from China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 63(August), 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101404
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research - A Guide to Design and Implementation. In Jossey Bass - A Wiley Brand (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edit). SAGE Publications; Inc.
Oranga, J., & Matere, A. (2023). Qualitative Research: Essence, Types and Advantages. Open Access Library Journal, 10(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Fraud-The human face of fraud: Understanding the suspect is vital to any investigation. CA Magazine-Chartered Accountant, 136(4), 1–18.
Wang, Y., Yu, M., & Gao, S. (2022). Gender diversity and financial statement fraud. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(2), 106903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106903
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12).
Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125(December 2016), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.035





.png)















Contact Person +6282139474255
Email : ijebir@citakonsultindo.or.id / editor.ijebir@gmail.com