The Role of TransJakarta Public Transportation in Improving Economic Accessibility for Low-Income Communities (MBR): An Islamic Distributive Justice Perspective

Muhammad Arief Saputra; Kasmin

doi:10.63922/ijbqr.v4i03.6590

Muhammad Arief Saputra STEBI Aljabar Bandung, Indonesia
Kasmin Universitas BSI, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijbqr.v4i03.6590

Keywords: ransjakarta, Public Transportation, Low-Income Communities, Economic Accessibility, Islamic Distributive Justice, Maslahah

Abstract

Public transportation plays an important role in supporting urban mobility and providing access to employment, education, healthcare, and other essential economic and social activities. For low-income communities (MBR), transportation accessibility is particularly important because limited economic resources can restrict mobility and access to opportunities. This study aims to examine the role of TransJakarta public transportation in improving economic accessibility for low-income communities in Jakarta and to analyze this role from the perspective of Islamic distributive justice. This research employs a qualitative approach. Data are collected through semi-structured interviews, direct observation, and documentation involving TransJakarta users from low-income communities and relevant informants. The data are analyzed thematically by identifying patterns related to transportation accessibility, affordability, access to employment and economic activities, mobility barriers, and perceptions of fairness. The findings indicate that TransJakarta contributes to improving economic accessibility by facilitating mobility and supporting access to workplaces and essential services. However, accessibility is influenced not only by the availability of TransJakarta services but also by connectivity, first- and last-mile access, convenience, and the integration of transportation modes. From the perspective of Islamic distributive justice, accessible public transportation can contribute to the principles of al-'adl (justice) and maslahah (public benefit) by expanding access to public resources and economic opportunities, particularly for economically vulnerable groups. The study highlights the importance of developing an inclusive public transportation system that considers the needs of low-income communities and promotes a more equitable distribution of transportation benefits.

References

Gaduh, A., Gračner, T., & Rothenberg, A. D. (2022). Life in the slow lane: Unintended consequences of public transit in Jakarta. Journal of Urban Economics, 128, 103411.
Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
Martens, K. (2012). Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer’s “Spheres of Justice” to the transport sector. Transportation, 39, 1035–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
Litman, T. (2024). Evaluating accessibility for transportation planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.00.
Musselwhite, C., & Shergold, I. (2013). Examining the relationship between mobility and wellbeing in later life. Journal of Transport & Health, 1 (1), 1–7.

Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1993). Al-Mustasfa min ‘ilm al-usul. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic vision of development in the light of Maqasid al-Shariah. Islamic Research and Training Institute.
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah made simple. The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Dusuki, A. W., & Abozaid, A. (2007). A critical appraisal on the challenges of realizing maqasid al-Shariah in Islamic banking and finance. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 15 (2), 143–165.